Sometimes the media gets so out of control about the problems with the NBA & NFL players that it seems like a never ending stream of "So and So did this" and "Black athlete anonymous did that" reports are all there is to talk about in between the plays of the week and World Series of Poker. I could go on a rampage and blast ESPN and the various media outlets for never really giving burn to the athletes that actually do something in their communities (Stephon Marbury always gets the selfish tag but have any of you seen his resume for community work?), but I won't for now.
And don't mistake this for being about Michael Vick getting a bad rap. Dude fucked up - plain and simple. Yeah, they could lay off just a bit on the guy because it doesn't need to be blasted as much as it has and Bill O'Reilly's attempts to link Vick's dogfighting accusations to Hip Hop warrant me to slap him with a white glove and challenge him to a duel. But for someone of Vick's stature to be caught up in something as inhumane as this deserves whatever he gets for just being dumb as fuck. If there are holes in the accusations will they apologize a la the Duke Lacrosse team? Don't think so but I digress...
David Stern has been dealing with some "cleaning up the NBA" issues that have linked the black athlete to the image problems within the league. But something happened this morning that brought a pretty cynical smile to my face. A heinous crime took place that had absolutely nothing to do with any athlete who's skin contains melanin. As a matter of fact, the dude who committed this act that is certain to haunt the NBA for possibly the next 10 years looks like this...
"Wait! hang on a second," I thought as I rubbed my eyes figuring my mind was playing tricks on me this morning. I shook the morning cobwebs out and squinted real, real hard (you know, that good squint like when you are tired and drunk driving home from the club) at the TV...
"Yeah...he's white," I said under my breath in semi-amazement. Fam, when I tell you that I turned on the closed captions to make sure I wasn't hearing wrong I definitely am bullshitting you not...
REF ACCUSED OF BETTING ON GAMES
The FBI is investigating allegations that veteran NBA referee Tim Donaghy bet on basketball games over the past two seasons, including ones in which he officiated.
The law enforcement official said the bets involved thousands of dollars and were made on games during the 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 seasons.
According to the Elias Sports Bureau, Donaghy officiated 68 games in the 2005-06 season and 63 games in 2006-07. He also worked 20 playoff games, including five last season -- Pistons-Magic on April 23; Warriors-Mavs on April 27; Suns-Lakers on April 29; Nets-Raptors on May 4; and Spurs-Suns on May 12.
In a statement issued late Friday afternoon, commissioner David Stern said the league will help the government in any way it can.
"We would like to assure our fans that no amount of effort, time or personnel is being spared to assist in this investigation, to bring to justice an individual who has betrayed the most sacred trust in professional sports, and to take the necessary steps to protect against this ever happening again," Stern said. "We will have more to say at a press conference that will be scheduled for next week."
The FBI probe, which began recently, also involves allegations that the referee had connections to organized crime associates. Other arrests are expected, the official said.
Holy Shit! A crime that truly affects the game of basketball was NOT done by an African American? No way! Organized crime associates? FBI probe? Get the fuck outta here! David Stern woke up this morning with an epic sized turd in his bowl of cereal.
And we all know and understand the American concept of "guilty until proven innocent" (or is it vice versa *shrug*) but Donaghy has already resigned. He also a chronicled history of gambling problems, which really doesn't help his case whatsoever. Not to mention that trends in games he officiated (including a head titlting Heat-Knicks game that found the Knicks shooting 39 free throws to the Heat's 8 and included technical fouls called on Heat coach Pat Riley and assistant Ron Rothstein. The Knicks won by six. What was the point spread? New York favored by 4 1/2) are slowly turning up.
So forgive me for celebrating on this glorious day when I won't have to be bombarded with reports of Barry Bonds "tainted" home run record (fuck Bud Selig and Hank "Uncle Tom" Aaron btw). Pacman Jones won't be forced down my throat with whatever the fuck it is he's done now (and if I hear anyone reporting his "Making It Rain" again I'll bash my skull against the nearest brick wall). Vick and his dogs, the gotdamn Bengals and even the B-Hop/Winky Wright scuffle will take a backseat to this (don't be fooled though...the shit isn't getting as much attention as it would get if Donaghy looked like Allen Iverson).
So excuse me as I beam from ear to ear because today is a day that the black athlete gets a day off (a partial day is one small step). There's no personal effort by an athlete that will impact the actual game like this shit right here. This is like a drive by shooting Vs Halliburton. A dirty gotdamn secret David Stern wishes would go away right about now. I'm sure they are wishing this could get swept under the rug. But the truth is that this ref affected a whole bunch of people's money and possibly the credibility of the NBA for a long long time.
So Dave, media and everyone else that has consistently blamed the player for fucking up the game, I have one thing to say to you...
"The Chickens Have Come Home To Roost" - (c) Malcolm X
Excuse me as I treat myself on this wonderful day because tomorrow it'll be Pacman, Barry Bonds and some other anonymous negro making headlines again.
But until then...
The views and opinions expressed in this blog are those of the writer and not necessarily those of HipHopDX.com or Cheri Media Group.
Racism: Discrimination or prejudice based on race.
Prejudice: An adverse judgment or opinion formed beforehand or without knowledge or examination of the facts.
So here we are, a few days removed from the NBA Rules? Racist As F*ck blog that set some of you smooth the fuck off. The dialog is appreciated. As it is obvious from the great lot of comments, many of you simply don’t agree with the blog. Some see it as a direct comparison between the NHL and the NBA (which is not the basis of the argument). Some see it as black vs. white. A couple actually made sense out of the direction of the blog and the purpose behind it.
The isolated rule in itself isn’t “racist”, it’s stupid. David Stern may love or loathe black people, we’ll never know. White people may or may not be better fighters than black people, that’s a case by case basis. There’s no hardcore facts to support any of this. But David Stern’s “cleaning up the game” rules have been built upon racist viewpoints created by the media’s portrayal of the black athlete in conjunction with Hip Hop culture (although the two should not have to be synonymous).
You don’t believe me? Well here’s an excerpt from a Yahoo! Sports article (By Adrian Wojnarowski; Oct 30 2006) that quotes Stern and his concerns during his “cleaning up” stages…
"Stern is reluctant to discuss the racial overtones that seem to find their way into criticisms of his league, but he will say, "When Ron Artest went into the stands, it was, 'All those players are …"
He doesn't fill in the blank. Plenty of people do it for him.
And then he says, "And I know for a fact that they're not [all the same], so I wonder why they're so easily generalized. Maybe we're not doing as good of a job as we should be doing, or maybe there's something else at work."
Something else? I wonder what that is? And who is “they”? Stern has done a helluva job tiptoeing around the topic but to say that race has not played a factor into how any of these rules have come into play or are interpreted over the years is ridiculous. The criticism is there and we can act as if this has nothing to do with the fact that the players are black but I won’t. But I won’t blame the NBA for making the rules, I’ll blame the media for its portrayal of the black athlete. I’ll also blame the media for making times difficult for Stern and Co. to appease his fans and supporters.
See, the NBA’s rules of “cleaning up” the league (whether it be the dress code, no celebrations, taunting, fighting, arguing with refs, long shorts, headbands, etc) are in response to what the media thinks and in turn projects to the public . When I used the term "cleaning up the league" and likened it to "whitening up the league", I meant it. Regardless of what you may think; dress code, celebrations, taunting, long shorts, dress code and everything else were all introduced by African American ballplayers and were subsequently removed via the “rules”. The media has convinced you that style and swagger are all "unsportsmanlike conduct." But why is that? What's wrong with a little shit talking? What harm did long shorts really do? Celebrating after a great play may piss off the other team but is it really that big of a deal?
The NBA wants to make it a friendly and relatable sport so when Fox News, CNN, ESPN and other news networks constantly report about “thugs” who “ruin the game” and it is broadcast into millions of homes do you think Stern and Co. are not paying attention? And what color pops into your head when the term “thug” is used?
Still don’t believe that race plays a role in any of this? Oh okay, apparently that’s not enough for those who were utterly disgusted for me calling the NBA rules racist. Here’s Bill Simmons (who is a white guy by the way) from ESPN.com’s Page 2 answering a question posed by a reader (posted May 18th)…
From Alex in Puyallup, Wash.: ‘I was reading the comments of some of the other NBA experts on ESPN and one of them mentioned the fact that people would see the NBA as a bunch of 'thugs' if they allowed bench-clearing fights. Don't you think it's odd that baseball players aren't referred to as 'thugs' when they engage in a bench-clearing brawl, yet NBA players are often seen in this manner? Often times, a brawl in baseball is looked upon as a positive by the fans of the team. They see it something that gets the team fired up or it 'shows that they care.' So why are NBA players considered 'thugs' for doing something that's almost celebrated (in some circles) when it occurs in baseball? I have a suspicion as to why this is, and it has little to do with one sport wearing shorts and the other wearing pants. Just some food for thought.”
‘My response: One of David Stern's biggest concerns has always been marketing a mostly black league to a mostly white fan base. The NBA has always battled covert racism to some degree -- if Kyle Farnsworth charges out of the bullpen and decks nine Red Sox players during a brawl, he's a bad-ass and it's all in good fun, but if Stephen Jackson does it, the black/white thing hangs over everything, right? My Page 2 buddy Jemele Hill and I exchanged some e-mails about that on Wednesday -- Jemele believes that the Horry/Nash incident wouldn't have received as much play if Barbosa had been sprawled below the press table instead of Nash. And you know what? I agree. Nash's involvement reminded me of the O.J. Trial for this reason -- if Nicole looked like Regina King and Ronald Goldman looked like Usher, that wouldn't have been the most famous American trial of the 20th century. Same for the Nash/Horry play. It's still a big deal if Barbosa is involved ... but not as big of a deal as seeing America's favorite white point guard lying there, right?’
But apparently what I said was completely unjust…
What’s so “dirty” about the league that doesn’t happen in other sports? Fighting? That happens everywhere. What else is there? What made the league not “clean”? Who decided that? The media.
The media sets the foundation constantly by portraying the league in a certain light. Too many blanket statements about the league being full of “thugs” has begun to seep into the pores of the public. Sure, there are a few bad apples but “thugs”? The term is directly related to blackness which is in itself racist. Hockey is a violent sport. Yes, fighting is a part of the game but there have been some savage ass whippings handed out. While the over the top behavior may get the individuals called many things, the term “thug” isn’t thrown their way for a brutal high stick incident.
Now for those that say fighting is “part of the game” I want to ask, “Does it help you win the game?” If so, then the question is “How?” The object of the game, much like soccer, football and basketball is to put the object in the opponents goal. Now the means of defense to stop one from obtaining that goal may be physical but none of which state that you may pummel your opponent with your fists. If it was “part of the game” then there would be no penalty for doing it. With that being said, I’m not knocking those that love hockey nor those that play it. I’m just citing the obvious.
The comparison isn’t the fighting itself, but the perception of the fighting (as referenced in the previous Bill Simmons quote). Baseball brawls happen about as often as fights in the NBA but they don’t give the sport a black eye like a brawl in the NBA does. Why such a microscope on the NBA? You be the judge.
I personally don’t think there is anything wrong with wearing suits but the dress code rule was put in place to make the league more presentable and to erase an image that wasn’t media and fan friendly. Some dared to say that cornrows and tattoos were something that the fanbase couldn’t identify with (word?). That, my dear friends, is driven by race.
The media has kept this image of a black man with cornrows, tattoos and jewelry as a “thug.” A “thug” isn’t what he wears, it’s what he is. A suit really isn’t going to change that. If you really have character issues in the NBA then something needs to be done to make these ballplayers better MEN. Whether it be etiquette classes or whatever. If the real fear is a thug mentality then a suit isn’t going to stop them.
What the media has done is magnify things to the point where people react. Whether it be rules, laws, purchasing guns, medicine, condoms or even convincing you what an “illegal immigrant” really is (that's a whole different blog). For example:
In the news, the “hood” is a place where crime always happens. In just about all cases it’s a bunch of black and brown people. And when something does happen, they always find the most ignorant person to talk about it on camera (I have no idea why). Now some of you have grown up in this “hood” and say “It ain’t THAT gotdamn bad.” Well too late, the damage is done. It has now been magnified to the point where not even your black friends will come see you. Their parents didn’t even want to risk the perceived danger. A ripple effect happens all out of fear. Nobody wants to move there, property value plummets, etc etc etc.
The fact that the property value has gone down isn’t racist but the reason behind it is. A concept was created based on fear which was all created by this beast called the media. The NBA has turned into the “hood” for some. The NBA All Star game was a “hood” event full of “thugs” that was seen as a total disaster by many (although New Year’s has a much larger arrest per person rate in Vegas but there are no “thugs” there right?).
In this Suns vs. Spurs situation a rule was created with a big grey area. The rule states that when a player leaves the bench area during an “altercation” he is automatically suspended for one game. What the hell constitutes an altercation? Emotion? A technical foul? What if two players are jawing at each other? Tim Duncan walked on court for a hard foul in a previous game, yet there was no “altercation.”
If a fight were to happen would it be another black eye on the NBA’s image? Guaranteed the detractors would come waving their “I Told You So” flags and the whole “thug” and “gangsta” nonsense would be started again. Why can’t a fight be a fight no matter what league it is?
Some of you blasted me for pulling the “race card.” It was a bit of tongue in cheek humor. Because if I didn’t, guaranteed someone else would have just because color was brought into the conversation. To absolutely ignore the fact that race is a factor in this country is foolish. It has to be recognized, whether you like it or not.
To those who say that what I did was “separating the races” I’d have to respond to that suggestion being a foolish as well. Nobody that read this article was a target of hate nor was the intention to separate whites from blacks. The blog called the NBA rules racist not David Stern, not white people, not you. What I did was take common misconceptions and apply them to a topic and everyone went wild by using racial statements to combat my perceived and misconstrued racism (an oxymoron at its finest).
This really isn’t about “the white man is holding me down” theory. You don’t have to be white to take part in being an oppressor. You don’t have to be black to be part of the oppressed. But don’t get carried away and say that White issues are the same as Black issues or Black issues are the same as Hispanic issues or Gay issues. The lingering problem here is that there are issues and prejudice that still reside at the top of many corporate ladders. Most of them have done a great job convincing you thru the media that racism doesn’t exist unless it’s blatant and anyone who recognizes it is pulling the “race card.”
Go on ahead and keep hollering that “race card” nonsense. There are still race issues in this country and they still are evident in our everyday lives even though not as overt as back in the 60’s. Until Mumia Abu-Jamal’s case gets as much press time as Paris Hilton’s, I won’t be convinced otherwise. Until there are more African Americans in positions of power at record labels & sports organizations, I will still play the “race card.” Until Malcolm, Martin, Huey, Marcus, Nat, Fredrick, Che, Fred, Angela, Assata and the many others who have been instrumental in the shaping of this world get more than a paragraph in our children’s history books, I will still play the “race card.” When the percentage of black screenwriters on television is around 10%, I will still play the “race card.” When the prisons consist of black men occupying a jail cell at 10 times the rate of white men, I’ll still play the “race card.”
No, it’s not an excuse why I don’t have a job. That’s silly. I do have a job. But that doesn’t mean one can’t recognize a problem. That’s like saying because the NBA has black players it CAN’T be racist. That’s silly rhetoric. Or to say that with integration that all black people's problems disappeared into thin air. To have a bunch of strong black men make you tons of money while you sit and do nothing may not be racist to some (but it sure sounds familiar to others). The problem becomes when those strong black men are just black players and not people.
So piss on my grave. Call me a coon or an uneducated, ignorant fool. Be repulsed. Fire away with insults but I bet you will talk about this blog as you did the other. Whether you agree with me or not matters to me none. I rather you engage in critical dialog and think about the situation and apply it outside of just the NBA. Some can handle this with well thought out conversation, some can’t. Regardless, maybe the next time you turn to your trusted media source you’ll think before you react.
The views and opinions expressed in this blog are those of the writer and not necessarily those of HipHopDX.com or Cheri Media Group.
Got Amare Stoudamire and Boris Diaw 1 game suspensions in a huge playoff game while the antagonist Robert Horry got 2 games.
But this…
Is simply part of the game and gets you a few minutes in the penalty box?
Hmmmmmm…
Is the Gotdamn Editor-In-Chief going to pull out the race card? You gotdamn right I am!
Look, the fact of the matter is that the NBA has been trying to “clean up” (read: whiten up) its image for quite some time now. The dress code alone was a reactionary precaution to the "thug" image the NBA didn't want to perceive (which is ultimately bullshit because many have no problem with suits, it should be up to the team to make those decisions IMHO). The fact also remains that the league is run by white men with a majority of black men running around in it so at the end of the day those corporate white guys don’t want a bunch of “thugs” messing up the game they love to make money off of.
Now I’m not saying Robert Horry shouldn’t have received a suspension because he very well should have for plowing poor Steve Nash (didn’t it look like he killed him?), but the league rules that say a player cannot leave the bench area are clearly retarded. Why you ask? Simple. It was put in place so situations like the infamous Pistons/Pacers brawl wouldn’t happen again. That scared the SHIT outta white people. I personally was appalled by the players behavior but I was also just as appalled by the fans behavior. The little fat guy who jumped on the court and got mauled by a sliding Jermaine O’Neal right cross is still hilarious to me today. I don’t know what the hell he was thinking. At any rate…
Now back to the essence of the argument. The fight scared the shit outta white people. So David Stern and the corporate suite conglomerate devised a plan to make sure that a fight of that magnitude would never happen again (which was already in place but reinforced even harder). The rule stipulates that any player who leaves the bench area during an on court altercation will be automatically suspended for one game. Now that should have made life pretty simple. You see two people fighting and you watch. That’s that. But there’s this thing called human emotion that most people (black & white) have. When one of your boys are about to get into an altercation you want to diffuse the situation before it happens but you can’t do that yelling “stop guys!” from the bench. Or you may just want to make sure that nothing happens which most people do when we all know shit is really not going to happen.
What Amare and Boris did was try to get a closer look at what happened to the decimated Steve Nash (who looked like he got hit with a Street Fighter II fireball). Right when Amare and Boris realized that the coaches were yelling “Nooooooo!” they turned their asses around. It’s human nature to see what’s going on. But the fact of the matter is that there was no fight so why the hell should there be a suspension? Tim Duncan walked his monkey ass onto the court from the bench after a hard foul but since there was no perceived altercation he wasn’t suspended. Bruce Bowen has been hammering the fuck outta the Suns (knees Nash in the groin and kicks at Amare’s ankles) but he gets nothing.Hard fouls by Baron Davis and Jason Richardson went unscathed as well. But this deserves a suspension?
Black fights scare the shit outta white people.
White people fighting…
Black people fighting…
Now as sad as it is, the perception is that when white people fight (as they do in hockey) it’s not really dangerous. Some might say it’s actually funny. I’m not saying that there aren’t white people that can’t whip some ass, I’m merely making an observation based on people’s opinions (which can be downright wrong because I’ve seen some white people get in some barnburners that would make the UFC blush). But for some reason, when black folks throw down a whole new sense of danger opens up. When Ron Artest ran into those stands I swore the terror alert went from yellow to red instantly. But a fight in hockey is expected. Hell…people are pissed when one DOESN’T happen. Oh how I can guarantee that wouldn’t be the case if the NHL for some reason became predominantly black.
The worst thing about this whole situation is that it very well may cause the Phoenix Suns a crucial game on the road to the championship. What’s even worse is that this situation may very well be ignored if the Suns somehow managed to find a way to win this game and close out the series in six. The rule is one thing that needs to be argued. People who love the game and want to see a good series know this shit is bogus. But I love the game and I also love my people (well most of them) and there’s much more to this rule and many of the “whitening up” rules the NBA has enforced for the past few years. But it takes a situation such as this to recognize that there very well may be a problem with these stupid ass rules.
People fight. It’s a fact of life. It happens everywhere from the NBA and NHL down to Soccer moms and dads fighting each other. But only in the NBA can you get suspended (not fined which would have made a helluva lot more sense in this situation) for making someone else think that a fight may be on your mind. And as long as the NBA stays black with black players making up such a high percentage of the players, don’t expect these rules to change.
The views and opinions expressed in this blog are those of the writer and not necessarily those of HipHopDX.com or Cheri Media Group.